Back
PubMedPrenatal application

Trio-Exome-Based Mendelian Inheritance Error Analysis Helps Identify Uniparental Disomies and Resolve Discordant NIPT Findings.

Xu T, Zeng Q, Lu X, et al.Prenat Diagn 2026 · August 2026
Relevance score
7/10
Disease / domain
Uniparental disomy and discordant noninvasive prenatal testing
Source
PubMed
PMID 42584023
Share on LinkedInBluesky

Variant / mechanism

Systematic Mendelian inheritance error analysis of trio exome data, quantified by a biparental inheritance percentage, to detect uniparental disomies including heterodisomies invisible to absence-of-heterozygosity analysis.

Summary

Uniparental disomy, particularly heterodisomy, is an underdiagnosed cause of fetal growth restriction and discordant noninvasive prenatal testing, because conventional absence-of-heterozygosity analysis frequently misses it. The authors validated a systematic Mendelian inheritance error pipeline on trio exome data in a two-stage study covering 1,948 parent-offspring trios: a retrospective cohort (n = 992) established the quantitative biparental inheritance percentage threshold, which was then applied prospectively (n = 956) to discordant noninvasive prenatal testing and unexplained fetal growth restriction, with orthogonal confirmation by methylation or short-tandem repeat analysis. Using a biparental inheritance percentage below 0.7, the pipeline identified 12 clinically significant uniparental disomy events, of which 25% (3/12) were heterodisomies missed by standard exome absence-of-heterozygosity analysis. Prenatally, it resolved 57.1% (4/7; 95% CI 18.4% to 90.1%) of discordant noninvasive prenatal testing cases, documenting trisomy rescue and confined placental mosaicism that explained the associated growth restriction; postnatally, it unmasked 8 uniparental disomy events associated with imprinting disorders.

Synthesis written by Geno'X. For the full original abstract, please refer to the source publication.

Analysis

This is the kind of work laboratories like: no additional data to generate, detection relies on re-reading trio exomes already performed, and it recovers precisely the blind spot of heterozygosity-based analysis, namely heterodisomies. Caution concerns the clinical numbers: 12 events, and above all 4 of 7 resolved prenatal discordances, yield a confidence interval spanning 18% to 90%, which supports a feasibility conclusion but not a resolution rate to quote to a couple. Two transposition requirements should not be forgotten: the approach presupposes trio exome sequencing, so it does not apply to singleton proband testing, and any suspected disomy must keep its methylation or short-tandem repeat confirmation before reporting.

Analysis by Dr Thibaut Benquey

Why this score?

Impact 2/3Evidence 3/3Novelty 1/2Sample 1/1Publication 0/1

Clinical impact: 2/3 · Evidence strength: 3/3 · Novelty: 1/2 · Sample size: 1/1 · Publication status: 0/1 → Total: 7/10

Keywords

prenataluniparental disomyNIPTfetaltrio exome
Weekly report in your inbox

Every Wednesday · Annotated selection · Free · Unsubscribe anytime