Back
DPYDHGNC PubMedCPIC Level ADose recommendationNew recommendationPreemptive genotyping

Importance of and Strategies for Implementing DPYD Testing to Prevent Severe Fluoropyrimidine Chemotherapy Toxicity in Health Care Systems

Kratz J, Merritt K, Jorgensen J et al.Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2026 · April 2026
Relevance score
9/10
Disease / domain
DPYD testing implementation before fluoropyrimidines — 2025 FDA recommendations and institutional deployment strategies
Source
PubMed
PMID 42048619
Share on LinkedIn

Gene–drug pair / mechanism

Review of DPYD testing implementation following FDA boxed warnings (capecitabine/5-FU 2025), ASCO/NCCN alignment, practical deployment strategies in healthcare systems

Summary

Following the 2025 FDA boxed warning addition to capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil labels recommending pre-therapeutic DPYD testing, the American Society of Clinical Oncology publishes a practical review of institutional implementation strategies. This update aligns US practice with European recommendations (EMA) and synthesizes organizational approaches for integrating DPYD testing into oncology workflows, including pre-ordering models, turnaround times, and management of variants of uncertain significance.

Synthesis written by Geno'X. For the full original abstract, please refer to the source publication.

Analysis

The 2025 FDA alert marks a decisive turning point for DPYD testing adoption in the United States, long behind Europe. This ASCO review translates recommendations into concrete operational strategies, essential for teams that must now deploy DPYD testing at scale in their institutions. Worth monitoring for upcoming CPIC/NCCN guideline updates.

Why this score?

Clinical impact: 3/3 · Evidence strength: 3/3 · Novelty: 1/2 · Sample size: 1/1 · Publication status: 1/1 → Total: 9/10

Keywords

DPYDfluoropyrimidinesFDAimplementationpreemptive pharmacogenomics

More articles on DPYD

Weekly report in your inbox

Every Wednesday · Annotated selection · Free · Unsubscribe anytime